Pursue Excellence Through Divine Wisdom and Academic Distinction: All Programs at The American University of Science (AUS)

Canonical Reference Code (CRC): AUS.INS.FRM.OBJ.001.V1.0

INSTITUTIONAL OBJECTIVES

Nescire est initium sapientiae

To not know is the beginning of wisdom

In fidelity to the Declaration of Faith and the Philosophy of The American University of Science (AUS or the University), and consistent with the University’s Mission, Vision, Values, Institutional Integrity, and authorized scope of postsecondary Christian higher education, the following Institutional Objectives constitute the University’s educational aims and student-centered outcomes. Rooted in the conviction that intellectual humility is the foundation of wisdom (Nescire est initium sapientiae), these objectives articulate the standards by which the University ensures educational quality, institutional effectiveness, and mission fidelity across its approved programs and instructional modalities.

OBJECTIVE 1 — STUDENT LEARNING AND INTELLECTUAL MASTERY

AUS ensures that students demonstrate measurable attainment of clearly defined program learning outcomes through rigorous instruction, disciplined inquiry, and evidence-based scholarship ordered toward truth.

Measures of Effectiveness

• Program Learning Outcome (PLO) attainment measured through direct assessment (signature assignments, standardized rubrics, comprehensive evaluations).

• Course-level Student Learning Outcome (SLO) alignment and achievement documented through curriculum mapping and assessment reports.

• Student academic performance indicators, including course completion and progression benchmarks.

Assessment Cycle and Benchmarks

 Benchmarks for learning outcome attainment, course completion, and progression are established annually and reviewed through the University’s assessment reporting process in accordance with the Institutional Assessment and Continuous Improvement Plan.

OBJECTIVE 2 — FORMATION IN ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CHRISTIAN MORAL CLARITY

AUS forms students in ethical reasoning, professional responsibility, and moral discernment consistent with the Declaration of Faith, so that graduates demonstrate integrity in conduct, judgment, and vocation.

Measures of Effectiveness

• Institution-wide ethical reasoning assessment using common rubrics in designated courses or capstone experiences.

• Documented student conduct outcomes and academic integrity practices.

• Graduate self-report and employer or supervisor feedback related to ethical professionalism, where applicable.

Assessment Cycle and Benchmarks

 Benchmarks for ethical reasoning and conduct outcomes are established through institutional rubrics and reviewed annually.

OBJECTIVE 3 — STUDENT PERSISTENCE, COMPLETION, AND EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS

AUS advances measurable student success by strengthening persistence, academic support, and timely completion aligned with program requirements and educational purpose.

Measures of Effectiveness

• Retention and persistence rates, including term-to-term and year-to-year measures where applicable.

• Graduation and completion rates by program and instructional modality.

• Time-to-completion and credit accumulation milestones.

• Student satisfaction and utilization of academic support services.

Assessment Cycle and Benchmarks

 Benchmarks for retention, completion, and time-to-degree are defined by program and modality and reviewed annually.

OBJECTIVE 4 — CAREER PREPARATION, PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE, AND VOCATION

AUS prepares students for professional excellence and service by ensuring graduates demonstrate competencies appropriate to their disciplines and are equipped for career advancement and constructive societal contribution.

Measures of Effectiveness

• Evidence of competency attainment through capstone projects, practica, or internship evaluations where applicable.

• Graduate outcomes including employment, advancement, or licensure/certification results where relevant.

• Employer and field feedback regarding graduate preparedness and professional performance.

Assessment Cycle and Benchmarks

 Benchmarks for career preparedness and professional competence are informed by program expectations and external feedback and reviewed annually.

OBJECTIVE 5 — SCHOLARLY ENGAGEMENT, RESEARCH LITERACY, AND STEWARDSHIP OF KNOWLEDGE

AUS cultivates research literacy and scholarly competence so that students can evaluate evidence, practice methodological integrity, and apply knowledge responsibly for human flourishing.

Measures of Effectiveness

• Research literacy assessment through information literacy benchmarks and research methods performance.

• Quality indicators for capstone, thesis, or project work using standardized rubrics where applicable.

• Student participation in scholarly activities such as presentations, publications, symposia, or research initiatives.

Assessment Cycle and Benchmarks

 Benchmarks for research literacy and scholarly engagement are defined through curriculum assessment and reviewed annually.

OBJECTIVE 6 — HUMAN DIGNITY, COMMUNITY, AND EQUITABLE STUDENT SUCCESS

AUS sustains a learning community that honors human dignity and strengthens equitable student success through respectful engagement, intellectual hospitality, and consistent student support.

Measures of Effectiveness

• Equity-of-outcomes monitoring, including retention, completion, and achievement data, as permitted and appropriate.

• Student climate and belonging indicators measured through validated surveys or structured feedback.

• Participation in community engagement and constructive civic or professional contribution.

Assessment Cycle and Benchmarks

 Benchmarks for equitable student success and community engagement are monitored annually using approved institutional indicators.

OBJECTIVE 7 — INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

AUS demonstrates institutional effectiveness through systematic assessment, documented analysis, and implemented improvements that strengthen educational quality, student success, and mission alignment.

Measures of Effectiveness

• Annual completion of program assessment reports in accordance with institutional requirements.

• Documented “closing-the-loop” actions demonstrating implemented improvements and subsequent evaluation.

• Evidence of governance oversight in assessment priorities and institutional improvement actions.

Assessment Cycle and Benchmarks

 Benchmarks for institutional effectiveness and improvement actions are defined within the Institutional Assessment and Continuous Improvement Plan and reviewed annually by institutional leadership and the Board of Governors.

GOVERNANCE, GUARDIANSHIP, AND PERPETUAL ALIGNMENT

The governance of AUS, entrusted to its Board of Governors, constitutes a formal fiduciary stewardship of the University’s foundational governing framework. This stewardship transcends administrative obligation and establishes the enduring standard by which institutional authority is lawfully sustained.

Each provision of this codified text is subject to ongoing review and deliberate reaffirmation. Through this process, the University’s institutional identity remains faithfully aligned with its original purpose and continuing mandate, while remaining responsive to the evolving demands of higher education.

The Board of Governors conducts formal and periodic reviews of the University’s authoritative instruments to preserve alignment between institutional intent and institutional practice, ensuring that the University’s identity and direction remain sound and enduring over time.

• First Review: June 3, 2022

• First Ratification: September 3, 2022

• Most Recent Review: June 3, 2025

• Most Recent Ratification: September 3, 2025

• Review and Ratification Cycle: Annual, in perpetuity

PUBLICATION AND ACCESS

This codified text is permanently incorporated into the authoritative institutional record of the University, in whatever form issued, under the authorization of the Board of Governors. It is maintained as a public and accessible expression of the University’s institutional identity and governing commitments, ensuring faithful institutional disclosure over time.